Detroit Railfanning
Re: Detroit Railfanning
Lucas,
Do you get any passenger trains in your area?
Do you get any passenger trains in your area?
roger
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
-
ogauge47
Re: Detroit Railfanning
rogruth wrote:Lucas,
Do you get any passenger trains in your area?
Roger, yes! We get several Amtrak trains from Detroit-Chicago. The service is subsidized by MDOT and good portion of the route is owned by Amtrak so we enjoy 110 mph speeds and pretty reliable service. Michigan corridor Amtrak recently received new Siemens Charger locomotives and we should be getting hew passenger coaches in the next couple years.
Re: Detroit Railfanning
ogauge47 wrote:rogruth wrote:Lucas,
Do you get any passenger trains in your area?
Roger, yes! We get several Amtrak trains from Detroit-Chicago. The service is subsidized by MDOT and good portion of the route is owned by Amtrak so we enjoy 110 mph speeds and pretty reliable service. Michigan corridor Amtrak recently received new Siemens Charger locomotives and we should be getting hew passenger coaches in the next couple years.
Maybe photos?
roger
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
-
ogauge47
Re: Detroit Railfanning
rogruth wrote:ogauge47 wrote:rogruth wrote:Lucas,
Do you get any passenger trains in your area?
Roger, yes! We get several Amtrak trains from Detroit-Chicago. The service is subsidized by MDOT and good portion of the route is owned by Amtrak so we enjoy 110 mph speeds and pretty reliable service. Michigan corridor Amtrak recently received new Siemens Charger locomotives and we should be getting hew passenger coaches in the next couple years.
Maybe photos?
Here's the new Siemens Charger locomotive



Re: Detroit Railfanning
Thanks, Lucas. Interesting paint scheme. Too bad it doesn't match anything. I wonder if there are plans to paint cars to match?
roger
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
Re: Detroit Railfanning
A brick has more style.
I spend entirely too many hours a day tying my shoes
Re: Detroit Railfanning
robert. wrote:A brick has more style.
Yes and they still look like the ones that were called "toasters".
roger
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
-
ogauge47
Re: Detroit Railfanning
Lucas,
It has been over a month.
Nice to see something from you again.
It has been over a month.
Nice to see something from you again.
roger
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
-
ogauge47
Re: Detroit Railfanning
rogruth wrote:Lucas,
It has been over a month.
Nice to see something from you again.
Thanks Roger!
I took a little break from train photography and am getting back into it after the holidays.
Here is one of the last NS high hood GP38-2's switching Oakwood Yard in Melvindale, MI

and NS 15Q with the 1066 NYC heritage unit in Holland, OH

Re: Detroit Railfanning
As I have said before, I am not a fan of graffiti but now and then there is some that is actually interesting and very nice to see.
I have noticed that some do not paint over needed railroad information and I appreciate that.
Admit that I do not know much about it so probably should keep mouth shut.
I have noticed that some do not paint over needed railroad information and I appreciate that.
Admit that I do not know much about it so probably should keep mouth shut.
roger
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
-
ogauge47
Re: Detroit Railfanning
It is widely-followed protocol to not cover reporting marks, because that’s really the only way to get your work covered up. As long as those aren’t tampered with, anything goes.
Re: Detroit Railfanning
ogauge47 wrote:It is widely-followed protocol to not cover reporting marks, because that’s really the only way to get your work covered up. As long as those aren’t tampered with, anything goes.
This must be a relatively new position and I find that it might be agreeable. I know that was a problem in the past and I noticed on one of your photos that the reporting marks are not covered.I wonder how and when and by whom some agreement was made.
Thanks for the info.
roger
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
Re: Detroit Railfanning
rogruth wrote:ogauge47 wrote:It is widely-followed protocol to not cover reporting marks, because that’s really the only way to get your work covered up. As long as those aren’t tampered with, anything goes.
This must be a relatively new position and I find that it might be agreeable. I know that was a problem in the past and I noticed on one of your photos that the reporting marks are not covered.I wonder how and when and by whom some agreement was made.
Thanks for the info.
RFID/GPS hardware/software installed/retrofitted on many/most modern 'interchange'
rolling stock makes what's painted on the sides of the car 'moot.'
I'll stop, now.
-------
-----
Unplug When Done.
-----
Peace,
MYron R. MOOre
Unplug When Done.
-----
Peace,
MYron R. MOOre
Return to “O-Gauge, 3-Rail, Model Railroading”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests




